Search for: "Cox v. Amend"
Results 421 - 440
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Petitioners essentially assert that, instead of access, the Commission should have merely amended Rule 14a-8 to allow for access bylaws. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:17 am
Cox, 10-CR-85-WMC, U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
O’Brien, 16 Cox C. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Cox v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
Exclusive: the IPKat reveals the Court of Justice's secret formula for tackling IP references for preliminary rulings Also earlier today, in the loftier forum of the Chancery Division, Mr Justice Arnold was being asked if he wouldn't mind amending the questions on which he had previously asked the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Limited, noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
" However no additional authority was thereby conferred, since to do so would have required an amendment to Article I of the Constitution, such as the one that the assembled deputies and bishops rejected.) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:42 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
Cox, 2010 U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm
No. 08-1435 (Dec. 18, 2008), establishing the availability of a writ of certiorari from a circuit court to an inferior court under Amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution; and Cox v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
This article provides an overview of this new law.Act SummaryH.B 10-1394 (Construction Professional Commercial Liability Insurance Act or Act) amends CDARA and the Colorado Insurance Code by codifying certain interpretive rules for occurrence-based liability policies insuring construction professionals. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In Ostergren v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
Cox v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
See Chadwick v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
” Cox, supra, 138 N.J. at 16 (citing D’Ercole Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am
The unanimous decision in Maqaleh v. [read post]
