Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court" Results 421 - 440 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 4:04 pm by John C. Manoog III
Liberty Mutual brought a motion to dismiss the case stating that Blue Cross had already paid the medical expenses, and on summary judgment the Superior Court agreed and dismissed the case. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
"  Although the standard of review of a trial courts factfinding is one of deference, Cesare v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a decision filed May 25, and belatedly ordered published June 15, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed in part a judgment of the San Bernardino County Superior Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals affirmed the superior court order on the MAR and denied a new trial. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:26 am by Siyabonga Mathe
South African courts have begun to hand down judgments electronically via email and publication on court websites, for example the case of Liberty Group Limited v Illman. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Superior Court of San Diego County/Hohnbaum, et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm by John Rubin
Groom, 353 N.C. 50, 84–86 (2000); see also Jessica Smith, Absolute Impasse, North Carolina Superior Court Judges’ Benchbook (Nov. 2011). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm by John Rubin
Groom, 353 N.C. 50, 84–86 (2000); see also Jessica Smith, Absolute Impasse, North Carolina Superior Court Judges’ Benchbook (Nov. 2011). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:35 am
Importantly to the Court of Appeal's analysis, "filed a 'request[]' in Santa Clara County Superior Court asking the court 'to issue a case number and endorse' the four subpoenas. [read post]