Search for: "DAVID BRENT"
Results 421 - 440
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
Thus, for example, progressive legal historian Carl Brent Swisher followed up his critical biography of the laissez faire justice Stephen Field (1930) with a highly sympathetic biography of Roger Taney (1934). [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
The best Design Book: David Stone's European Design Law: A Practitioner's Guide and finally the Best IP Book: Intellectual Property and the Judiciary, edited by Christophe Geiger, Craig Allen Nard and and Xavier Seuba.The subject matter of Intellectual Property by Justine Pila studies terms such as “invention” and “trade mark” in the context of their use by legal officials. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
Maxine Aaronson – @maxineaaronson Edward Ackels – @edack7 Tim Ackermann – @ntxip John Adolph – @americajohnline Mike Aigen – @zarleyziggy Omar Alaniz – @omarjalaniz Zahara Alarakhia – @zazalaw Christy Albano – @christyalbano Michelle Alden – @mrsaldie Vince Allen – @iplawtexas Andrea Almeida – @azalmeida Frank Alvarez – @frankalvarez337 Charles Ames – @charlesamescpp David Anderson – @danderson1973 Jeremy… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
Maxine Aaronson – @maxineaaronson Edward Ackels – @edack7 Tim Ackermann – @ntxip John Adolph – @americajohnline Mike Aigen – @zarleyziggy Omar Alaniz – @omarjalaniz Zahara Alarakhia – @zazalaw Christy Albano – @christyalbano Michelle Alden – @mrsaldie Vince Allen – @iplawtexas Andrea Almeida – @azalmeida Frank Alvarez – @frankalvarez337 Charles Ames – @charlesamescpp David Anderson – @danderson1973 Jeremy… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
Presiding Judge Sharon Keller faces a strong challenge from Justice David Britches from the Fifth Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” In an op-ed for The Week, David Faris criticizes “Democrats’ limp messaging. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/2bnmr2k (David Hechler) What Would Hal 9000 (WWH9D) Do for eDiscovery? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
” The cases are USA v David Nosal in the 9th U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
Confidentiality Creep and Opportunistic Privacy, Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Forthcoming, David S. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:42 pm
Wasby SUNY, Albany, wasb@albany.edu Participant(s): Melinda Gann Hall Michigan State University, hallme@msu.edu Matthew Kleiman National Center for State Courts, mkleiman@ncsc.org David C. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
Among the items was a visor the fan believed was worn by an android character played by Brent Spiner. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:11 am
David Barboza of the Times reports. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Additional coverage comes from Brent Kendall, Jess Bravin and Laura Stevens for The Wall Street Journal, Bill Mears at Fox News, Richard Wolf at USA Today, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Pete Williams at NBC News, Lydia Wheeler and Naomi Jagoda at The Hill, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Bernie Becker and Josh Gerstein at Politico, Jon Chesto for the Boston Globe, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters,… [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has promised a new anti-terror law aimed at preventing domestic terror attacks. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (17): Brent Bailey v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
The indictment alleges that, through a series of sham sales, co-conspirators, including Abdulwahab and David White, continued the fraud scheme through September 2009. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Meanwhile, the head of Media Matters, David Brock, is gloating about the negative impact his organization’s efforts are having on Limbaugh’s advertisers. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr and David McLaughlin report that “[k]ey justices explored possible middle ground” during the arguments. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
David G. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, David Rivkin and Andrew Grossman maintain that if Kavanaugh declines to answer “questions on legal issues that might come before the Supreme Court,” “[i]t’s the senators who will be in the wrong, for demanding commitments that no judicious nominee could provide. [read post]
