Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V. UNITED STATES " Results 421 - 440 of 566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Although connectivity promises good things, it also creates a market for data brokerage and data distribution. [read post]
If the entity is outside of the United States, there are questions of accountability and whether proper recourse exists. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:16 am by Amy Hogan-Burney, George Ramsey
The solution is not to simply ignore these real-world practicalities or treat cybercrime as activity that is beyond ordinary, available legal recourse or straightforward, practical solutions. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
 If PBMs are improperly compensated – and many members of Congress publicly state that there is a problem with PBMs – then this is a societal issue that demands a legislative solution. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
(Plutarch, The Fall of the Roman Republic, Sulla, ¶ 31).In the West it has long been common for leaders of states (or those whose leadership guides the state) to establish proscription lists. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
It seems highly likely that Justice Stevens was assigned only two majority opinions to write from the first three sittings because Stevens was also writing the principal dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]