Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 421 - 440
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that the Guidelines were constitutional. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:29 am
District Judge Lorna G. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
Instead, the university’s finance department provided the information for these reports even though the employees of that department had limited or no knowledge as to which grants they actually worked on. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
Six other amicus briefs have been filed, including one on behalf of nineteen states and the District of Columbia supporting North Carolina’s view, and one filed by – among others — the Gun Owners Foundation in support of Heien. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Clark, “The Union of Law and Equity,”[2] 25 Columbia Law Review 1-10 (1925)· P.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Circuit should depart from its traditional practice. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 10:56 am
Khwaja, who brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and filed an administrative complaint in the Department of Transportation in 2012. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, in a case of first impression, considered whether the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
District Court for the District of Columbia delayed signing off on the deal, voicing “great concerns” about certain aspects of the settlement terms. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
I think these courts are correct. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
Additionally, genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the department’s conduct was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, so it was for the jury to resolve this issue (Amobi v District of Columbia Department of Corrections, June 27, 2014, Brown, J). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia: In the Matter of the Search of Information Associated with [redacted] @mac.com that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Apple, Inc., 2014 WL 945563 [hereafter, In re Matter, supra]. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Most of the approximately seventy-five cases the Justices hear and decide each Term come from the federal appeals courts, which are divided into e twelve regional circuits that cover the country, including one for the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
§ 3141, et seq., and the DCLMA, D.C.Code § 2–201.01, et seq., the project’s prime contractor, Whiting–Turner Contracting Co., provided a payment bond to the District of Columbia as an assurance that project laborers would receive payment at Department of Labormandated hourly rates. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia: In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 3:21 pm
In holding that the trial court did not err when it instructed the jury that the District of Columbia "place of business" exception applied only to persons "with a controlling, proprietary or possessory interest in the premises," the D.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:02 am
Bullock then has 30 days to make an appointment.The commission is composed of four lay members from different geographical areas of the state who are appointed by the governor, two attorneys appointed by the Supreme Court and one district judge who is elected by the state's district judges.Current members of the commission include District Judge Richard Simonton of Glendive, Shirley Ball of Nashua, Mona Charles of Kalispell, Patrick Kelly of Miles City, Lane Larson of… [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
. abide by [state Department of Corrections] policy” in running the facility. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold ninety minutes of oral argument on six consolidated challenges to the government’s authority to regulate the emission of greenhouse gases from industrial facilities. [read post]
