Search for: "DOES 1-121"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Lawrence County v City of Ogdensburg, 40 NY3d 121, 126 [2023]; see Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][ii][c] [1]), as well as the power to "adopt and amend local laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution or not inconsistent with any general law relating to its property, affairs or government" (Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][i]). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:59 am
” Diss. op. at 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Angelina V. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1371. 1373; emphasis added.) [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
September 1, 1962]). [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:00 am
Angelina V. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1371. 1373; emphasis added.) [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
But does the State affirmatively have to allege and prove a lack of consent? [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:42 am
Randle’s work does not qualify him as a “transportation worker” under the § 1 exception. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
See Renbl , 121 AD2d 546 (2d Dept 1986); 7 NYJur2d Attorneys at Law 4 295. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
R., 2017 CMAC 2 (37701) Does s.130 (1)(a) of the National Defence Act violate s. 11(f) of the Charter. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
See G.S. 90-90(1)c.; 90-92(a)(1)a.; 90-92(a)(1)ww. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
” Id. at 121 n. 6. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
” Id. at 121 n. 6. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Davis, 121 Ohio St.3d 239, 2008-Ohio-4527, 903 N.E.2d 609, ¶ 1, citing State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
” Coming to this conclusion does not require a consideration of judicial comity. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
” Coming to this conclusion does not require a consideration of judicial comity. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
" Where the term is used in New York law, however, in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1182(1), it does not encompass the conduct in which Merqui engaged here. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The retroactive effect of a decision dismissing the appeal does not alter the pending status of the application. [read post]
