Search for: "DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE"
Results 421 - 440
of 892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
It’s recognizable business advice, but what does it mean for HR executives in terms of successfully advancing the corporate agenda? [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Does that mean that the Law Society is empowered to intervene in private litigation in order to advance the cause of justice? [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the 'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 4:01 am
It’s a summary of all appeals as well as leaves to appeal granted so you will know what the SCC will soon be dealing with (November 16 to December 21, 2018 inclusive). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 1:12 pm
We stand with and encourage all school and district leaders who are committed to systems based on mutual respect, grounded in evidence-based educational practices and whose focus is to create safe, inclusive and positive educational environments. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 11:57 pm
Was the term “persons of color” intentionally selected because of its broad application or does it fail to address the intended inclusion of more specific groups? [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:19 pm
Workplace harassment does not simply remain in the realm of celebrity, its reach is much greater. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:00 pm
Background 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The appellate court first held the suit was ripe for review, rejecting the County’s claim that “the controversy does not apply to a specific set of facts” as required in Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:48 am
” A notable difference between these definitions is the CCPA’s inclusion of information linked to a particular “household. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:48 am
” A notable difference between these definitions is the CCPA’s inclusion of information linked to a particular “household. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 1:58 pm
An elaboration of these thoughts follow.1. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
We also understood we were many and that we might not like each other or each other’s practices very much sometimes.[1] We also understood how everyone else saw us. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
It is an inclusive notion, which includes dance and mime in most jurisdictions. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:22 am
However, this does not mean that the average worker is not also burdened by these taxes. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:37 am
We seek to identify what the Commonwealth does well and to point out opportunities for improvement. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
That does not sound like a full copyright term extension beyond the international treaty standard of life of the author plus 50 years. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
.: Burger chain’s public image didn’t justify ‘Fight for $15’ button ban The Fifth Circuit enforced an NLRB order finding that In-N-Out Burger violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA when it barred employees at an Austin, Texas, restaurant from wearing buttons supporting the “Fight for $15″ movement. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
”[1] At Slate, it was “Something has gone wrong with Connecticut. [read post]
