Search for: "David B. Long" Results 421 - 440 of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
There are certainly more integral components, but a logo goes a long way. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
  They have now been given life-long anonymity. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by David Post
To the extent “intermediate scrutiny” has teeth — and I’m generally skeptical of this point — it comes in part (b): Has the government demonstrated that these disclosure provisions do not “burden substantially more speech than necessary” to advance that interest? [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In this one, which is going to be very long, I’m going to describe in some depth the arguments in both the majority opinion by Judge Janice Rogers Brown and the dissenting opinion by Judge David Tatel. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:51 am by Amanda Frost
  Bayer claims that Wood states in her article Adjudicatory Jurisdiction and Class Actions that notice and an opportunity to opt out are not constitutionally mandated, even in Rule 23(b)(3) class actions, as long as class members are adequately represented. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:36 am by Andres
The UK government appointed David Anderson QC to conduct a review of the investigatory powers legislation. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 5:51 pm
That would be Michelangelo's David in the Accadamia in Florence. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:28 am
You get wonderful pre-1945 background from Barbara Tuchman's Stilwell and the American Experience in China.Amazon does turn up one title, The China Lobby in American Politics, by one Ross B. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:53 pm by David Post
Although the complete terms of the settlement have not been publicly disclosed, the details that have been released (see statements here and here) include (a) an acknowledgment by Axanar that its films “crossed boundaries” of what was “acceptable to CBS and Paramount relating to copyright law,” (b) agreement by Axanar’s producers to make “substantial changes to Axanar to resolve this litigation,” and that any future Axanar productions will… [read post]