Search for: "Diamond v State"
Results 421 - 440
of 990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 2:53 pm
(Connie Stafford v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:47 pm
Therefore, the Court dismissed the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint. 545 Halsey Lane Properties v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4100952 (EDNY 8/19/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Due Process, Equal Protection, Uncategorized [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Gov’t agencies and private parties may police these claims under federal and state laws.Artist compensation claims are fact-based, not opinion/puffery. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In American Meat v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
The community of Kopimi requires no formal membership, although the Church is said to count around 3,000 members: Sacred symbols are CTRL+C and CTRL+V. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:07 am
This was further cemented in 1999 with the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeal’s RIAA v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 4:56 am
This distinction was expressed incredibly well by David Kappos for SCOTUSBlog: "[t]he distinction between patentable software in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Citing Diamond v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
Diamond v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
See Diamond v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:42 am
As the Court in Diamond v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[Yes]Precedential No. 21: IKEA Gets Split Decision Against AKEA: Section 2(d), Yes in Part; Dilution, NoCAN DEW for Nutritional Drink Mixes Confusable With Pepsico's Famous DEW Mark, Says TTABCITIAIR for Travel Agency Confusable With Famous "CITI" Family of Marks, Says TTABSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is DIAMOND Merely Descriptive of Paper-Cutting Dies? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
” Breyer contrasted those steps with the additional steps claimed in Diamond v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The distinction between patentable software in Diamond v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
Flook); and (3) a computer-implemented process for curing rubber (Diamond v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:32 am
There's a huge gap between Diamond v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
In Werdebaugh v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
First, this blog by the “Activist Investor” stated a belief that CEOs shouldn’t serve on the board at all, much less serve as the board chair. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am
They focus on the methodology that the Court has formulated to assess if state interference complies with constitutional provisions to determine if state intervention into property interests has been legitimate. [read post]
