Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 421 - 440 of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  To them, D&O insurance policies are the very source of proceeds that was purchased in order to protect and benefit directors and officers and D&O claimants. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs testified that they would consider purchasing ads from Meta again if Meta corrected or removed the misleading Potential Reach metric. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Steve Delchin
  The plaintiffs claim that they have sufficient income to pay for emergency medical care if they needed it, and they would not purchase health insurance in 2014 if it wasn’t for the new federal health care law. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
 In light of that “directive,” Judge Feuerstein concluded that granting the defendants’ request was “not warranted. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
 In light of that “directive,” Judge Feuerstein concluded that granting the defendants’ request was “not warranted. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
AdvaMed members and subsidiaries manufacture nearly 90 percent of the health care technology products purchased annually in the United States and more than 50 percent of the health care technologies purchased annually around the world. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., 18-2086, 2020 WL 728628 (1st Cir. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 6:17 am by John Jascob
Samarco Mineracao S.A., March 4, 2021, per curiam).Between 2013 and 2015, plaintiff Banco Safra, the Cayman Islands branch of a Brazilian bank, purchased $135,102,000 in debt securities issued by Samarco Mineracao S.A., a Brazilian mining company. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am by Bona Law PC
So even though federal law bars these claims, class-action defendants still face them when a separate group of indirect-purchaser class plaintiffs sue in federal court under a hodgepodge of state antitrust laws. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The claim also included the allegation that consumers were induced to purchase the Mint’s dolls and plates based on a mistaken belief that they were endorsed by, associated with, or affiliated with Diana, her estate, and/or the Fund. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Here, the plaintiffs alleged mail and wire fraud, which, the court said, was integrally related to the purchase and sale of securities. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 3:27 am by Broc Romanek
Back in September 2014, Interloper and Family Dollar direct competitor, Dollar General, commenced an unsolicited tender offer to acquire Family Dollar at (a now-revised) $80.00 net per share in cash. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:03 am
Plaintiff argued that the facts alleged in its false advertising, tortious interference with business relationships, and defamation claims meant that defendant purposefully directed its conduct towards a Kansas resident. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
… Kentucky’s wholesalers receive benefits that are even more direct: based upon the evidence presented by Plaintiffs, [they and similar wineries] would bypass Kentucky’s wholesalers altogether if the in-person purchase requirement were lifted. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:24 am
The United States District Court granted summary judgment for both defendants.On June 8, 2004, plaintiff purchased a tractor manufactured by defendant CNH. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Erica Siepman
  The court noted that Section 16(b) groups “purchase and sale” and “sale and purchase” together, indicating that they are each “directed at the same prepositional object—i.e. the same equity security. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm by Law Lady
ALEJANDRO AMARO, Appellee. 3rd District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Relief from judgment -- Void judgment -- Foreclosure judgment in favor of junior mortgagee was properly found to be void as to senior mortgagee whose mortgage had been recorded before that of junior mortgagee -- Trial court erred in finding that motion to vacate judgment was not timely filed, as party may move to vacate void judgment at any time -- However, order denying motion to vacate judgment is affirmed, as section 702.036,… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She states that the husband has left her and the children virtually destitute, unable to purchase food or clothing. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
“: Purchasing USA-based hosting for a site that is not legal to be run in America is not a sensible thing to do. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Because both registered and unregistered shares are available for sale upon the company’s direct listing and the sales are conducted through anonymizing brokerage transactions, it is not possible for any purchaser to trace the particular shares she bought back to the registration statement covering the direct listing. [read post]