Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
The plaintiff filed suit under the Sherman Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
The plaintiff filed suit under the Sherman Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
The plaintiff filed suit under the Sherman Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The plaintiffs don’t have direct evidence of a conspiracy, so they attempt to make a circumstantial showing. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Inventory purchases are encouraged as a participation activity, rather than something that represents retail sales. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
Rather, the court held that the lower court did not commit error in accepting the plaintiff’s expert’s argument that, because the company itself will not assume any future tax liability in purchasing the plaintiff’s shares, the plaintiff “will remain liable for his share of the corporation’s tax liability for as long as he remains a shareholder and receives a K-1 reporting them. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 5:15 am
A court will tell the plaintiff that he “… should have insisted on these [exclusivity] terms in the parties’ contract rather than agreeing in writing to the opposite. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
"After the Cuban economy grew by just over 1 percent in 2018, Cuban leader Miguel Díaz-Canel said that “Cuba’s fundamental battle” is economic and that one of Cuba’s urgent needs is attracting more foreign direct investment. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
R. 23(B)(3)’s predominance requirement, and held that subsequent purchasers of bonds do acquire causes of action under R.C. 1308.16, including third-party claims for breach of contract. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
The particulars of the case and the grounds for dissolution don’t interest me as much as the fact that the dissolution petition was filed after three years of fairly intense, motion-heavy, inconclusive litigation in Queens County Supreme Court between the same parties. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The latter point is relevant because often, the potential for rezoning is a key factor for prospective purchasers and sellers. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
In Congress, seats are strictly divided on party lines, which I feel only reinforces partisanship. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Part II will analyze the Kelo parties’ briefs from a practical perspective and provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s arguments. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
”Standing: Under Lexmark, “a plaintiff must allege an injury to a commercial interest in reputation or sales” proximately caused by violations of the Lanham Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Parma Bd. of Education, 44 Ohio App. 3d 169 (8th Dist. 1988) (“[a]s a general rule contract claims survive the death of the plaintiff. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
Even if the direct victims of Monsanto’s fraud ended up with crops that were fine, plaintiffs still alleged commercial injury because Monsanto’s misrepresentations caused third parties to use dicamba that destroyed plaintiffs’ crop, so plaintiffs had no soybeans to sell. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:29 am
In May 2017, Hirschfeld resigned from DTC Energy but not before Clausen purchased Sylar’s interest in DTC Energy during the previous month. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
Is the actual purchaser's use of the product and interest in the writing more relevant than that of purchasers of similar bands? [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
We insure against risk of direct physical loss to property described in Coverages A and B. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am
" Further, said the court, a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) "is properly granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes the plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law. [read post]
