Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2022, 7:22 pm
Intervenor-Plaintiff Ardell Howard The court suggested that an intervenor plaintiff might provide an easier path to a class representative. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs 21-1218Issues: (1) Whether a final judgment moots a pending appeal from an order denying intervention-of-right; and (2) whether a district court possesses subject matter jurisdiction to allow class members to intervene-of-right directly into a case coordinated in a multi-district litigation proceeding. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Illinois provides the backdrop here.[17] There, the Supreme Court held that a direct purchaser from an antitrust violator is the proper party to bring suit; indirect purchasers further down the supply chain are barred from bringing claims for damages.[18] While acknowledging that they did not purchase directly from Cardinal, the plaintiffs sought to invoke a line of Seventh Circuit cases holding that a direct purchaser from one member of… [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:19 am
With respect to GHG, the guidelines would require not only the company’s own direct GHG emissions (Scope 1), but indirect emissions from purchased electricity and other forms of energy (Scope 2). [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:38 pm
The Plaintiffs sought specific performance for an Agreement of Purchase and Sale, initially made on June 27, 2020. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 6:09 am
The complaint seeks to recover damages on behalf of the plaintiff class. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:45 pm
The sole cause in equity was a request for an order directing the escrow agent to release escrowed funds if plaintiffs prevailed and if the escrow agent refused to release the escrowed funds. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
Plaintiffs’ notices may have conferred scienter. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:14 am
” His marks are enrolled in Amazon Brand Registry, and Royal Silk Direct maintains an authorized Royal Silk “storefront” on Amazon.com. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
In support of his misclassification claim, the plaintiff alleged that the company closely monitors and directs the day-to-day operations of the delivery workers; the company sets mandatory sales goals for the workers and tracks their performance, through scanning software which must be purchased from the company; and the delivery workers have no discretion with regard to their customer base or manner of displaying the company’s products in the stores. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
” Two of the three packages in the complaint have dagger footnotes by “flushable” directing consumers to the side panel: A long list of "do not flush" instructions directing consumers, among other things, to consult "local rules" and not flush if "you are unsure of system capability"Plaintiffs alleged that they relied on the front label and did not read the side panel disclaimer before purchasing. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
” Plaintiffs alleged that this “difficult by design” subscription practice forced users to pay nonrefundable renewal payments. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
” Plaintiffs alleged that this “difficult by design” subscription practice forced users to pay nonrefundable renewal payments. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 8:07 am
Plaintiff purchased a laptop computer battery on Amazon.com. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 8:07 am
Plaintiff purchased a laptop computer battery on Amazon.com. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 6:28 am
The defendants undoubtedly will contest the plaintiff’s claims and deny the plaintiff’s allegations. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
The Court stated that Sponsor’s “advertising methods heavily directed people to make a trade in order to participate in this sweepstakes” and that its “statements regarding ‘no purchase necessary’ were ambiguous in light of the other statements regarding the need to ‘buy or sell’ Dogecoin. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
” But plaintiff’s survey didn’t test the right question—it asked about omission of a made in China label, not what messages were conveyed by the US iconography. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
Defendants argued that plaintiffs had to find a purchaser of each of the 42 separate Folgers products using the allegedly misleading label. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:23 am
" A week later UPCIC refunded plaintiffs the $1,366.35 they had paid in premiums up to that point by direct deposit into their bank account. [read post]
