Search for: "District of Columbia v. Trump" Results 421 - 440 of 906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by Katherine Pompilio
District Court for the District of Columbia and is a former public defender. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:46 am by Randy E. Barnett
There being no gun ranges in the District of Columbia, my course was taught in Virginia. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
In May, Judge O’Connor granted a Motion to Intervene filed by seventeen Democratic attorney generals from sixteen states[2] and the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Rudolph Contreras, but the case was reassigned to Sullivan’s court following Contreras’s recusal.In a subsequent colloquy, Flynn maintained and reiterated his guilty plea. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
During his campaign for the presidency, then-candidate Donald Trump announced that he would appoint justices to the Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
It says 33 states and the District of Columbia require electoral college members to cast ballots for a pledged candidate. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
The Justice Department was clearly aware of this, writing in filings in both the Western District of Washington and the District of Columbia that “the New Executive Order does not present a need for emergency litigation. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:43 am by Ugonna Eze
English is currently suing the administration in the District of Columbia Circuit Court, claiming that she should sit as interim director. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 10:01 am by Steve Kalar
Mar. 14, 2017), decision available here.Players:Decision by (the always-welcome) visiting District Judge Friedman, District of Columbia, joined by Judges Tashima and Paez. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
Each pointed the finger at the alleged bias of District of Columbia juries. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am by Patrick Quinlan
  Section 5 then prohibited those jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting practices or procedures without preapproval from the United States Attorney General or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that the change had no discriminatory purpose or effect. [read post]