Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 421 - 440 of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
If expressed as a percentage in terms of how likely it is the defendant committed the alleged act, the civil standard requires just over a 50% certainty. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
  (SPF 15 means that only 1/15thof the burning radiation will reach the skin, SPF 30 means only 1/30th will, SPF 50 means only 1/50th will, etc.) [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 1:14 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Power of Procurement: Smarter Strategies for Controlling Your Spend Think Like a Hacker: Defend Your Organization Against Ransomware-as-a-Service Attacks Improving Equity in Public Infrastructure What is an ESG Framework and How Does It Apply to Governments? [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 1:14 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Power of Procurement: Smarter Strategies for Controlling Your Spend Think Like a Hacker: Defend Your Organization Against Ransomware-as-a-Service Attacks Improving Equity in Public Infrastructure What is an ESG Framework and How Does It Apply to Governments? [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The settlement does not appear to involve the payment of any insurance funds; the stipulation recites that the settlement amount “shall be paid exclusive by the Settling Defendants. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
"This conclusion was further supported by a policy statement that provides that a reduction is not authorized under § 3582(c)(2) if the Guideline amendment "does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range because of the operation of another guideline or statutory provision" such as a statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
It states that security to the amount of 100 million euros ($132 million) is required to prevent further enforcement of the injunction (further below you can see it's twice 50 million euros for technically two injunctions), an amount that is disproportionately high considering how blindingly obvious the invalidity of this patent is. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 10:51 am by Steve Kalar
In connection with these issues, does the rule in Feolaapply only to jurisdictional elements, or does it also apply to elements such as drug type and quantity? [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:04 am by Eugene Volokh
The statute provides (in sec. 659A.885) that, if the plaintiff wins, he shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees, and may also be awarded compensatory and punitive damages; the court may also issue an injunction barring the defendant from continuing to violate the law. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:21 am by Daniel Shaviro
  The obvious thing for us to do, given that we apparently want to bet $1 million after-tax, is to cancel out the seemingly mandatory insurance by betting $2 million, rather than $1 million.Under either  an income tax or a consumption tax with a 50 percent rate, we end up in exactly the same place, i.e., with $1 million in after-tax stakes. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
Our firm is pleased to offer you a savings of 50% off the outstanding balance owed on this account. [read post]