Search for: "Doe PL"
Results 421 - 440
of 931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
Nor does he argue that the fees are unrelated to the costs of conducting the background checks. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
"]).7 Accordingly, on their face, PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
Accordingly, on their face, PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. ( People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:10 pm
As a result, RMP does not currently apply to much of the oil & gas sector. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
On the federal level, the United States Supreme Court has held that a valid disclaimer does not defeat a federal tax lien levied under IRC § 6321, Dyre, Jr. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Broken down to the simplest level, an arrest, indictment and conviction for Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Fifth Degree, New York Penal Law 220.31, is a crime that can, and often does, lead to a combination of incarceration, probation, and destruction of careers and livelihoods. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:32 am
iBiquity also contended that Continental's claim seeking a declaratory judgment of patent rights (Count III) does not arise under federal patent law because it is merely a state law breach of contract claim in disguise, seeking to interpret a license agreement. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:38 pm
While intent to use the firearm unlawfully is an element of NY PL 265.03(1), it is not an element or requirement under NY PL 265,03(3). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 12:20 pm
The RMP rule does not have the same atmospheric storage tank exemption, per se. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Assess your lawyer’s experience representing clients like you in PL 265.03 arrests. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:48 am
Further, even if your alleged conduct was not ongoing and systematic, as required by PL 195.20, you may have violated other crimes found in the New York Penal Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
Can that photograph constitute a violation of PL 120.14? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:41 am
Of great significance, and as noted by the appellate court, “[d]etermining whether a document is forged ‘does not depend so much on whether it contains a falsehood, but on whether, on its face, it misrepresents its authenticity’” (People v Briggins, 50 NY2d 302, 306 [1980]). [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Pls. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
And, as noted above, the statute does not require that the victim suffer pain or injury, and does not require the intent the intent to cause pain or injury. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
If they are similar, is PL 120.00 really just a lesser version or part of a lesser crime of PL 121.12? [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
An acquittal of one does not guarantee an acquittal of the other. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Punishable by up to four years in prison, any criminal lawyer or larceny defense attorney will certainly explain that the consequences are grave upon arrest or conviction of PL 155.30 or PL 165.45. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
Furthermore, there is no double jeopardy involved since double jeopardy does not attach until a witness is sworn at trial. [read post]
