Search for: "Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by The Greatest American Lawyer
  The other big concern is that the ABA itself, although it does regulate individual attorneys, the model rules that the ABA comes up with tend to be followed by most of the states. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Whether by company emails, an intranet website, Facebook group or other tools, clearly social media have become critical to employer/employee communications.Social media usage policiesJust as employers adopted Internet and computer use policies in the 1990's, now they are developing social media usage policies. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Mach II Aviation, Inc (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to object to prior art evidence at summary judgment bars objection at trial: Accentra, Inc. et al v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am by Adam Solomon
The proposed bill would also require merchants to provide a cancellation method that is available via the Internet and the telephone. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Supreme Court to hear case on inducing patent infringement: Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Eric
* The Fifth Circuit issued an amended opinion in MGE UPS Systems Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Gordon Firemark
AUTODESK, INC., 2010 Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Vernor v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Graphic Management Associates, Inc (Docket Report) Merely being a ‘sophisticated company’ does not impute an ‘intent to deceive’ for false marking claim: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
Ordinarily, “the content of a website (whether it is similar or different to the business of a trademark owner) is irrelevant in the finding of confusing similarity,” WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, paragraph 1.2; A&F Trademark, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Preci-Dip Durtal SA  (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False in forma pauperis application does not warrant dismissal: Kim v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:12 pm by Gareth
(Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay, Inc.,  600 F.3d 112, quoting Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]