Search for: "Does 1 - 175"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Response: Because Karl is a cash rent landlord who does not materially participate in the farming activities, he may not take advantage of the IRC §175 deduction. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Response: Because Karl is a cash rent landlord who does not materially participate in the farming activities, he may not take advantage of the IRC §175 deduction. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
John does not own or rent a farm. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
John does not own or rent a farm. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
¶¶ 112, 114, 152(a), 155, 175, 185.) [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
The Holding in Way May Be Limited Where does North Carolina law currently stand after Way? [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm
The Court however emphasises that a right of access to public documents does not by itself justify the dissemination of these documents or the data they contain: “the existence of a public interest in providing access to, and allowing the collection of, large amounts of taxation data did not necessarily or automatically mean that there was also a public interest in disseminating en masse such raw data in unaltered form without any analytical input” (§ 175). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:43 am
§ 1.1301-1(b) [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:43 am
§ 1.1301-1(b) [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
.), at p. 175). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
He does not recall who the officer was, but is sure that it was neither of the officers involved in the Castile incident. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:33 pm
What does that mean for taxpayers? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:29 pm
Doe 484 U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
Bausch, 2017 S.D. 1, ¶ 25 889 N.W.2d 404, 411 (quoting State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 8:12 am
$175 million. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
How does the new Bill seek to redress this problem of non-compliance? [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
And what does Monty Python have to do with it? [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:50 am
” Jacobien Rutgers (NILR 2017/1, p. 163-175) discusses the VKI/Amazon Case of the European Court of Justice (Case C-191/15) where the Court gave its interpretation of Art 6(1) of the Rome II regulation and Art 6(1) Rome I Regulation in a procedure started by a consumer organization based on allegedly unfair terms in general terms and conditions of the seller. [read post]
14 May 2017, 11:54 am
Of course, what the Act mostly does is amend Housing Act 1996 Part VII. [read post]
