Search for: "Does 1 to 40"
Results 421 - 440
of 11,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 4:16 am
To qualify, an employee must (1) be hired between February 3, 2010 and January 2, 2011, (2) provide an affidavit stating that s/he worked 40 hours or less in the 60 days before getting hired, (3) not replace another employee unless that employee voluntarily quit or was terminated for cause and (4) not be a “family member” under the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:09 am
Louis traffic ticket start at $40. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
The existence of a pre nuptial agreement does not affect or invalidate the terms of the I-864 Affidavit of Support. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:05 am
If the employer has 4-249 employees: 1 hour for every 40 hours worked If the employer has 250+ employees: 1 hour for every 30 hours worked 1 hour for every 40 hours worked When does an employee begin to accrue paid leave? [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
S., at 40. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 10:21 pm
IT DOES MAKE A PERSON, UH, WITH STUFF LIKE THIS HAPPENING, GET MORE AND MORE EXPERIENCED AT IT IN A SENSE. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
" The question becomes, does this refer to the policy of not having open files or does it refer to the court's finding that the prosecutors in this case failed to ferret out every last possible Brady issue in their file and turn it over? [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
The following percentages are presumed to be appropriate under the Texas Family Code: Child Support Guideline Percentages 1 Child = 20% of the obligor’s net resources 2 Children = 25% of the obligor’s net resource 3 Children = 30% of the obligor’s net resources 4 Children = 35% of the obligor’s net resources 5 Children = 40% of the obligor’s net resources 6 or more Children = Not less than 40% of the obligor’s net resources When… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The particular requirements are found in R 40 and R 42.[4] R 56(1), first sentence, refers to drawings referred to in the description or in the claims which appear to be missing. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:21 pm
It does not include elective deferrals such as employee contributions to a 401(k) plan. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm
Aaron Black is recognized as a 2012 Super Lawyer Rising Star in Criminal Defense (Top 2.5% of lawyers under 40 in Arizona and New Mexico). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:24 am
R.S. 40:1300.401 et seq. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:24 am
"Indeed, 99% of patent-licensing revenue in the United States is generated by companies that own 40% of all U.S. patents; that is, the remaining 60% of patent holders receive just 1% of the revenue. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
In addition to the federal estate tax, with a top rate of 40 percent, some states levy an additional estate or inheritance tax. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:50 pm
It does this in two ways. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
[NOTE: This post was updated with additional analysis at 1:23 p.m.] [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Hamilton and the insurance fund for foster parents alleging that (1) Hamilton choose not to summon emergency care or accompany Baby Doe to the hospital; and (2) Cook choose not to timely go the hospital after she was told to do so by the doctor. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
A public employer does not violate public policy by voluntarily including a reasonable job security provision in a CBA (see Matter of Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 40 NY2d 268, 274-276 [1976]; Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 267 [1976])[FN2].The clause at issue here was not shown to be unreasonable, as the CBA's three-year duration was relatively brief [FN3] (see Matter of Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist. v… [read post]
I am remarried. How does my NEW MATE'S INCOME affect my SPOUSAL SUPPORT or CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION?
24 Mar 2010, 7:41 am
Whether that is advisable based upon your numbers has nothing to do with your new mate's income, and should not cause you to hesitate - but again, it does depend on the actual respective numbers between you and Wife 1, which you did not provide me. [read post]
