Search for: "Does 1-188" Results 421 - 440 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
(b) Theft of property is a:(1) Class B felony if: . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Russell, 215 A.D.3d 1213, 188 N.Y.S.3d 759 (3d Dept. 2023) [see § 124. 08[1] n. 1.4], an incomplete response to the form’s “Question 13” resulted in denial of the employer’s application for Board Review. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (Patents Post-Grant) District Court W D Wisconsin: Judge Crabb does away with stand-alone Markman hearings: Dashwire, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nowhere does the record identify those state agency requirements, and defendants cite no statute, rule, or regulation from which the requirements may be judicially noticed. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
" Act of Apr. 10, 1790, §1, 1 Stat. 109-110. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
Trials A – D are technical trials about the validity and/or essentiality of certain patents (the Judge in Trial E observed that the sample in these technical trials was too small to allow him to draw any conclusion as to the quality of Optis’ Portfolio; also, that the decisions of very experienced first instance judges varied on appeal, showing that the outcomes of questions of essentiality and validity are nuanced and extremely difficult to predict: [188]). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
Peck, 6 N.Y.2d 97, 188 N.Y.S.2d 491, 160 N.E.2d 43 (1959); First National Bank of East Islip v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Table 1 shows the percentage of referrals to the three private bar sources for the main problem types. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
”   As lawyers for grand jury witnesses, we must do as Virgil does, and first off remind our client that, like the She-Wolf, the grand jury “tracks down all, kills all, and knows no glut. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Since the complaint does not set forth a specific or even a reasonably certain termination date, it does not satisfy the “definite term” element of section 62 (1) (b). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on April 27, 2022 No. 60 [*1]In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, vKathy Hochul, & c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on April 27, 2022 No. 60 [*1]In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, vKathy Hochul, & c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. [read post]