Search for: "Does 1-82"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2020, 12:13 pm
That criticism may have become less valid over time; when the $200,000 annual income test was first implemented in 1982, less than 1% of potential investors qualified. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:36 pm
The final rule does not permit individuals to self-certify that they have the requisite financial sophistication to be an accredited investor. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:36 pm
The final rule does not permit individuals to self-certify that they have the requisite financial sophistication to be an accredited investor. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
§ 1-82. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:09 am
Under the new accredited investor definition, the following parties would now be considered accredited investors: (1) designated professionals, such as those persons currently holding, in good standing, the FINRA Series 7, Series 65 and Series 82 licenses, others may follow; (2) private fund knowledgeable employees, including, but not limited to, executive officers, directors, general partners, trustees, advisory board members, or other affiliated fund persons overseeing the… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 7:29 am
The category of conducts that does not raise issues, provided that there are sufficient safeguards, comprises the forms of coordination entrusted upon a trade association or an independent third party (e.g. an independent advisor, an independent service provider or a public body). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:03 am
In determining whether an individual would qualify as an accredited investor based on a particular certifications or credentials, under the amended definition, the SEC will consider, among other things, whether the certification, designation or credential arises out of an examination designed to reliably and validly demonstrate an individual’s comprehension and sophistication in the areas of securities and investing – examples being a Series 7, 65 or 82 license. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:43 pm
It does not have to be that way. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
Each claimant is only liable for a several share of the common costs of pursuing the GLO and a several and equal share of any costs awarded to the defendant if the claim does not succeed. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
., § 8:82 (2020). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
McMichael, for example, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan held that "a commitment [for the purpose of firearm rights-deprivation] does not occur until the completion of an adversary process that results in an adjudicative decision in favor of hospitalization. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Because (1) some approvals – including the project’s tentative subdivision map – were not rescinded, (2) Newland’s attorney indicated it intended to proceed with the project in some form, (3) the case presented an issue of broad public interest and statewide significance (as indicated by a previous Supreme Court grant and retransfer on the email destruction issue), (4) the issues will likely recur, and (5) County continued to defend its document destruction… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:14 pm
(The orders made under the EMCPA but now revoked are available here [for example, O.Reg. 140/20, Agreements between Health Service Providers and Retirement Homes, which was revoked “on the last instant of July 23, 2020) Even if an order does not currently apply to any area of the province, it continues if it has not been revoked (for example, O.Reg. 82/20, Rules for Areas in Stage 1). [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:34 am
Unity of invention - originally filed claims (Article 82 EPC)1.1 According to Article 82 EPC, a patent application "shall relate to one invention only or to a group of inventions so linked as to form a single general inventive concept".That means that only if the application relates to more than one "invention", the notion of "a single general inventive concept" under Article 82 EPC and the concept of the "same or corresponding special… [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
King, 502 So. 2d 80, 81–82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (providing that a continuing guaranty covers all transactions, including those arising in the future, which are within the contemplation of the underlying loan agreement). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
King, 502 So. 2d 80, 81–82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (providing that a continuing guaranty covers all transactions, including those arising in the future, which are within the contemplation of the underlying loan agreement). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
King, 502 So. 2d 80, 81–82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (providing that a continuing guaranty covers all transactions, including those arising in the future, which are within the contemplation of the underlying loan agreement). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:59 am
Generally speaking, the scope of the ECommerce Directive does not have to be reconciled with that of underlying substantive laws. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
In his view, the mere provision of facilities would not mean mere provisions of mere facilities (at [82]). [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:08 pm
In On Call, it had been held that the relevant persons were employees at common law and so were entitled to superannuation contributions under the “standard” definition of employee in section 12(1) of the Super Act. [read post]
