Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 421 - 440 of 2,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
I believe that the amendment from a claim directed to a membrane to a claim directed to an artificial kidney comprising such a membrane does not go against this guiding principle.What do you think? [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:53 pm
This insurance does not apply to Bodily Injury or Property Damage arising from, due to or caused by: a. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Blogspot
LORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction 1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council Directive 2000/79/EC. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:14 am by Old Fox
What does it matter if Muslims revere Jesus, if the Jesus they revere was introduced into the Kora [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
Further, s.88(1) Housing Act 1985 specifically contemplates a joint tenancy becoming vested in one of two joint tenants, presumably by survivorship. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
Further, s.88(1) Housing Act 1985 specifically contemplates a joint tenancy becoming vested in one of two joint tenants, presumably by survivorship. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare, 88 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2004). [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It pointed out that as the patent lapsed several years ago, in accordance with R 84(1) and in line with decisions such as T 329/88, T 749/01 and T 1128/07, the present appeal proceedings should be terminated.According to the patent proprietor, R 84(1) did not make any distinction between oppositions filed before or after expiry of the patent. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 8:01 pm by Marco Rossi
The Tax Agency also refers to the recent cases decided by the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) with its judgement of February 26, 2019 in joined cases N Luxembourg 1 (C-115/16), X Denmark A/S (C-118/16), C Denmark 1 (C-119/16), Z Denmark ApS (C-299/6) (so called “Danish Cases)”. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
Hence, also the 'wearing' cycle is short-lived.But when does inspiration translate to an actual IP infringement? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by Jessica Kroeze
Accordingly, the finding of the Receiving Section that the application does not enjoy a right of priority was found justified.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:05 pm
Hexawave Inc., 88 USPQ2d 1332 (TTAB 2007), involving fraud based upon signing a sworn statement of use when there was no use of the mark for certain goods or services. [read post]