Search for: "Does I through IX"
Results 421 - 440
of 693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 6:21 pm
CASE: I-485 adjustment of status / I-140 / EB-11 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability) CLIENT: Chinese LOCATION: Cleveland, Ohio Our client contacted us in May 2014 about the possibility of getting an immigrant visa through the EB-11 category. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
In a one-shareholder WFOE, the supervisor does almost nothing, but Chinese law still requires you appoint one. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
She is a girl through and through – not something in between as the district suggests. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
(Interestingly, Kansas State University submitted an amicus brief on behalf of Yeasin, arguing that Title IX does not require universities to police off-campus conduct.) [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
In Fawzy, the parties agreed to resolve all matters pertaining to their divorce proceeding through binding arbitration. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:19 am
See id. ʺʹ[B]ut‐forʹ causation does not[, however,] require proof that retaliation was the only cause of the employerʹs action, but only that the adverse action would not have occurred in the absence of the retaliatory motive.ʺ Further, ʺthe but‐for causation standard does not alter the plaintiffʹs ability to demonstrate causation . . . through temporal proximity.ʺ Plaintiff meets these standards. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
I can’t even, to borrow a phrase. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
IX, § 2(c) and N.Y. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 1:12 pm
”[ix] Ct. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:55 pm
In sharp and disturbing contrast, the federal government – through one of its biggest agencies, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
What does “pretend” mean, especially as it is absent from subsection (b)? [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
I, §8, Clause 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:10 am
Exactly, no one will ever want to see the proof there either, and it does make for spectacular metaphors. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:33 pm
Work of a domestic nature within a household, includes but is not limited to: “(i) housekeeping; (ii) house cleaning; (iii) home management; (iv) nanny services; (v) caretaking of individuals in the home, including sick, convalescing and elderly individuals; (vi) laundering; (vii) cooking; (viii) home companion services; and (ix) other household services for members of households or their guests in private homes. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:11 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
I. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
I. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this site. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
It has long been clear that both indirect and direct evidence can support a finding of pretext through the McDonnell Douglas method, so there is no reason to label a piece of evidence one or the other. [read post]
