Search for: "Dollar v. U. S"
Results 421 - 440
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
” That’s the whole problem with them. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
Cartwright, 411 U. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
The federal government uses its contracting dollars not only to purchase the supplies and services it needs, but also to support broader policy goals. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:10 am
In other words, the dollars need not be in one’s hand if he or she can exert control over the item in question. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:10 am
In other words, the dollars need not be in one’s hand if he or she can exert control over the item in question. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:18 am
However, under the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Castellanos-Contreras v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
’” The Ninth’s Circuit made a similar finding in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
By Glen Hansen In Brandt Trust v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
” In People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
” In People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
United States, 367 U. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:01 am
Union No. 130, U. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:03 am
A recent case, Pickard v Tarnow ,2007 NY Slip Op 52377(U) [18 Misc 3d 1102(A)] ,Decided on December 3, 2007 ,Supreme Court, New York County ,Madden, illustrates the problem.In a nutshell, if the arbitrators allow any fees, even a dollar, they have implicitly determined that there is no legal malpractice, and there can be no future legal malpractice case brought. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
These might be grants tomorrow Bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow There’ll be grants Just thinking about tomorrow When the Court clears away the relists ‘Til there’s none Our definition of tomorrow is perhaps a bit elastic. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:38 pm
Op. 50069(U) (Sup. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:45 am
Can’t Live Without It, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
See Media Copyright Group, LLC v. [read post]
