Search for: "Douglas Williams v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  William Marbury did not get his commission. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:37 am
Supreme Court decision on the separation of church and state in public schools, McCollum v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Jim Martin
  In November 1975, Associate Justice William O. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm by administrator
App. 1988) (reversing conviction for public masturbation observed in a public bathroom); State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Jim Douglas has signed into law a bill that will tighten state regulations involving gifts to health care providers by makers of "prescribed products" like drugs and medical devices. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Douglas, who had retired the month before. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Justice William Douglas wrote in the majority opinion that the idea of government invading the marital bedroom is “repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] Douglas Mickey v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:42 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Douglas Although Justice Douglas did not establish a right of privacy in this case, the concept would come to fruition a decade later in the case of Griswold v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]