Search for: "Downing v. Municipal Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 12:28 pm
First, it upheld the law by applying the standard laid down by the Supreme Court in South Carolinz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
”[i] Leading up to the recent Illinois Supreme Court decision in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
A Rockland County law barring where sex offenders can reside was struck down late last month by New York State Supreme Court Justice William A. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:03 am
Ertner then applied for Section 207-c benefits.Ertner's application was rejected on the basis that her injury was not "incurred during the performance [of] a job function peculiar to a correction officer" and she appealed the determination.Noting that in Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, the Court of Appeals has ruled that entitlement to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Law and Section 207-c are discrete and entirely independent of one another,… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
Reid here: State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 4:35 am
In Alcantara v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:12 pm
In Joffe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Cunningham (2007), which struck down part of the state’s sentencing scheme, was dictated by the Court’s ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:45 am
Oral arguments in this case (Chevron v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:01 pm
” In recent years, since the 2005 Supreme Court decision of Kelo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:03 am
Lambert v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:31 am
The Howl saga invites comparison with Judge Spielmann's dissent to the European Court of Human Right's judgment in Muller v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States also centers on how lower courts interpret fractured Supreme Court decisions in which five of the court’s nine justices fail to come to an agreement,” such as “Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm
–North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
” Justice Kennedy, Separate Concurrence “Unless pursuit is necessary for the immediate protection of the public, it should be curtailed so that it does not create immediate risk” Justice Pfeifer, In dissent On December 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Argabrite v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:05 pm
Brewing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:05 pm
Brewing, Inc. v. [read post]