Search for: "Downloader 97" Results 421 - 440 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[2.2] In the present case, the decision to refuse the application was made under A 97(2) according to the state of the file. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:34 am
Yes, the provision does say that notice should be given to the site owner (s 97(3)). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The situation referred to by the ED, whereby subject-matter in respect of which a search fee has not been paid can only be pursued in a divisional application, presupposes that the searched and non-searched inventions are in fact found to be non-unitary when the ED upon review agrees with the opinion of the search division (see decision J 3/09 [5.1-7] and references therein to decisions G 2/92 and T 631/97; see also Guidelines for Examination, C-III, 7.10, third and fourth paragraphs, and… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
You can download the entire statement here, The questions in bold are those asked by the Inquiry in their request – read part 1 here. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:55 am by Evan George
Snider-Ashtari cited one remarkable set of figures that would come up again and again during the day’s discussions: 97% of nickel, 89% of copper, 79% of lithium and 68% of cobalt reserves and resources are located on, or within 35 miles of, tribal land (according to the Indian Energy Minerals Forum). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
This is how the district court judge who was assigned McNerney’s case went about sentencing him: [The court] calculated [McNerney’s] total offense level at 30, and [his] criminal history category at I, producing an advisory sentence range of 97 to 121 months. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is an appeal of the applicant (Amazon.com) against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse its application relating to matching a given item description (e.g. of a book) with stored item definitions (e.g. in a website’s product catalog).The USPTO acting as ISA found two X documents. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The subsequent, tort-based litigation resulted in the filing of 264 suits from over 2,400 plaintiffs in federal and state court for injuries and 97 deaths against more than 250 defendants. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:52 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Title 1 D0900,280 Faucet 2 D0900,147 Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface and computer icons 3 D0899,954 Sensor 4 D0899,890 Knob 5 D0899,889 Knob 6 D0899,882 Set-screw holder 7 10819405 Mitigating beam squint in millimeter wave wireless communication systems 8 10819165 Inductive harness coupling and communication for distributed architectures 9 10818163 Patient care system and an occupant support and occupant wearable item useable with the system 10 10818119 Radio… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
While a fractal pattern contributes to the inductive loading of the antenna system according to document WO-A-99/27608 (D2), the further documents WO-A-97/06578 (D1) and ES-A-2 112 163 (D5) describe antennas whose radiating arm is designed as an SFC. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
He infers this from the fact that in non-unity communications from the EPO, e.g. in the examination report dated 19 July 2006 concerning [the “parent” application], the standard wording “The time limit for filing divisional applications (R 25(1) EPC 1973) must be observed” is used. [8.1] According to the case law of the boards of appeal, the principle of protection of legitimate expectations governing the procedure between the EPO and applicants requires that communications… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
*** Translated from the German ***NB : All provisions refer to the EPC 1973.[10] The [patent proprietor] points out that the Opposition Division (OD) has made a legal error in its application of R 71a(1) when it considered that [the patent proprietor’s] submissions concerning the prior use Elsen were new facts and did not admit them into the proceedings. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This appeal was filed against the refusal of the application under consideration by the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm by Rick Hasen
Among other things, the the Court could have held that video-on-demand, which requires a cable subscriber to choose to download video for viewing, is not a “broadcast, cable or satellite communication that refers to a candidate for federal office” as defined by BCRA. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Ken Chasse
For example, a score above 50 may produce 97% of the relevant documents, but constitutes only 20% of the entire document set. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This appeal was directed against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) refusing a request for re-establishment of rights in relation to the time limit for paying the third-year renewal fee with surcharge in respect of a Euro-PCT application. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 2:59 pm
We heard about the role of common law legal education more generally, and its ‘fundamentally conservat(ism)’ (Burridge & Webb, (2007) 10(1) Legal Ethics 72-97 (forthcoming)). [read post]