Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 421 - 440
of 6,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
By bringing down the microscope on the multi-plaintiff actions that the plaintiffs’ lawyers filed in California federal court, Ely Lilly exposed the home states of those plaintiffs. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Judges, I thought, are understandably hesitant to begin down that road.Yet the California court rejects the argument, while at the same time upholding a right to same-sex marriage! [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:27 am
O’Handley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
So, if true, that leaves only the California Supreme Court as the entity that could authorize the transfer. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
The California is struck down in an opinion by Justice Scalia. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:09 pm
Precedent from the California Supreme Court is binding on lower courts, no matter how old the opinion is. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:01 pm
Yet Washington v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:55 pm
And if we had had an interview like this in 2019 I would have said that California is not in a state of drought, it’s a state of whiplash. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
The issue in Martel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:40 pm
The court cited multiple United States Courts of Appeals cases: First, in Hastie v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:25 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that a profit-sharing agreement among the grocery store defendants in California v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
She has made a series of public comments lately critical of such sweeping decisions; they go too far too fast says Ginsburg.A less judicially active approach in the Roe v Wade would have been strike down the Texas law outlawing abortion, but leaving the broader constitutional questions to be determined on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:23 am
The Plaintiffs in Dardarian v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:28 am
The result of his appeal was handed down yesterday. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
In response, some companies like VOX Media have laid off workers en masse – or blacklisting California writers to hire those in other states. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 10:30 am
Supreme Court in its 2023 decision striking down race-based admissions policies, Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
