Search for: "Doyle v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am by Randall Hodgkinson
State, No. 101,078 (Shawnee)State appeal (transfer)Jean K. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Representing Appellees Doyle and Margaret M. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
” Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers reports that the Court’s opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Except under "exceptional circumstances," an employer cannot refuse to permit an individual to resign from his or her positionMatter of Vinluan v Doyle, 60 AD3d 237Felix Vinluan, an attorney, represented a number of nurses at a Long Island nursing home, Avalon Gardens. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
Texas, on the state of equal rights advances for the LGBT community. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:15 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0234, 2009 MT 435N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]