Search for: "Dunn v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 9:46 pm by Kevin
For those who don't know the name, Ted Olson is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a former Solicitor General of the United States, winner of Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: Case Against - United States - Harvard University - NYT - Case: [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
We may have jumped the gun last week when we stated that Davis v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Power of Public Labor Unions In California, as in many other states, a public sector bargaining unit may, by majority vote, elect to create an “agency shop” in which the union is the collective bargaining agent on behalf of all the employees. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Saul, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law and Staff Attorney, Earthrise Law Center, Lewis & Clark Law School—Citizen Suits and Good Neighbor Agreements 12:30 pm - 1:30pm Lunch 1:30 pm – 3:00 pm  Session III—Promoting CSR at the State and National Levels: Non-Financial Disclosure Mandates Moderator:  Mary Ann Frantz, Partner, Miller Nash… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Dunn (1821) the Supreme Court established the principle that a congressional contemnor could seek judicial relief, and in Kilbourn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]