Search for: "EMPLOYERS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 421 - 440 of 3,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 7:40 am by Hill & Bleiberg
Our Atlanta Georgia law firm has long argued that insurance costs depend more on insurance company premium investment returns rather than claims by injured people. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
Secrist’s tip concerned the existence of a massive, ongoing fraud at his former employer, the giant insurance company Equity Funding. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A recurring issue under private company D&O insurance policies is the scope of the preclusive effect of the professional services exclusion. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
., directors) of the companies to do something their religions prohibit--in particular, to decide whether the employee health insurance plans offered by the three companies in question should include (or "provide") coverage of certain contraceptive methods.Second, in a series of posts (see the Posts labeled III, III-A and III-B below) I have explained that, contrary to popular belief, there is no "employer mandate":  federal law does not in fact require any… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm
If those rules are not blocked by the courts, they would authorize nearly all employers to block insurance coverage for birth control because of the employers’ moral or religious beliefs. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:05 am by Pete Strom
Only when your employer or insurance company agrees to factor in these aspects of your claim in their final offer can you say you’ve won the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Recent changes to federal regulations and guidance which may affect health insurance markets and relate to Association Health Plan (AHPs), Short-term Limited Duration Insurance (STLDI), Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs), and Section 1332 state innovation waivers might lead to changes affecting employers’ support of health insurance. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:06 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employees Agree to Noncompete Clauses with Employer  Two employee worked for an insurance company in Alberta. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:06 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employees Agree to Noncompete Clauses with Employer  Two employee worked for an insurance company in Alberta. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Timothy Ford
If there are costs that are not covered by insurance, employers should strongly consider covering any costs, particularly if mandated under the company’s employment policies. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:42 am by David DePaolo
Insurance companies guarantee that coverage within legal definitions and policy language. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:09 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
To defray the cost, Dunham put in a claim with for a disability insurance policy she had through her employers. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm by James Hoffmann
Do not let the insurance company or your employer deny you of your rightful benefits. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:13 am
The provisions of this requirement apply to any life insurance policy issued or renewed on or after August 28, 2009.H.B. 777 requires group policies by a health carrier or health benefit plan to comply with the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provisions regarding the continuation of group health insurance coverage to an individual who has terminated employment or membership.Captive Insurance CompaniesH.B. 777 changes the laws… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:54 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:13 am by David DePaolo
It's gratifying to know that there is an insurance company that meets its obligations and does so efficiently in an insurance environment so many others find challenging. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm by Julie Lam
  Thus, the Court of Appeals determined that the an injured employee may bring separate workers’ compensation actions against a direct employer and statutory employer under Section 171 without having to join all potentially liable parties in a single action. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:11 am by Jamie LaPlante
Despite what the contract language states, if the reality of the arrangement looks and feels like an employer-employee relationship, the company could be liable as a joint employer for discrimination and other employment-related claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
Additionally, employers do not have to cover independent contractors under workers’ compensation insurance and are not liable for payments under employment insurance, disability insurance or social security. [read post]