Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
"' Today, The Sacramento Bee reports, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger intends to file a court-mandated plan to address overcrowding in California prisons. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 12:06 pm
The court, in Porter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:24 pm
In a ruling on Monday that has just been made public, state District Court Judge Edward D. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:30 am
Duane Morris LLP v Astor Holdings Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:36 am
Edward T. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
California District Court Judge Edward Davila. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
” Citing Palmer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:54 pm
Apple was originally assigned to Judge Edward M. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
Galante, 176 Cal.App.4th 1226, 1237, 98 Cal.Rptr.3d 585 (Cal.Ct.App.2009) and Edwards v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
However, a recent ruling by a Deputy Labor Commissioner in California, coupled with at least two federal class action cases currently pending in California, have thrown the debate wide-open as to whether Uber and Lyft can legitimately classify their drivers as independent contractors. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
However, a recent ruling by a Deputy Labor Commissioner in California, coupled with at least two federal class action cases currently pending in California, have thrown the debate wide-open as to whether Uber and Lyft can legitimately classify their drivers as independent contractors. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:10 am
Latest Filing in Jewel v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
During the Senate’s consideration of the DTSA, California’s Sen. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Gans weighs in on the argument in Armstrong v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am
It would be very dangerous to deny relief in this instance”.There were no representatives of either Equustek or the Canadian Supreme Court in attendance, and Judge Edward Davila agreed with Google’s request for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
