Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 5:08 pm
" Deloris and Bobby England v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:52 pm
The case is R (Gentle & Ors) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
The employee contended that because the district court found his claims would have to be brought in England, but the U.K. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The first was a straightforward Jameel v Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm
” However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
In Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:53 am
The Court concluded that a receivership order was appropriate as it was predictable that the respondent would be sued in England and domestic and international policy favours the efficient recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
This is the third of a three part post dealing with the key libel cases over the last twelve months or so in England and Wales. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:09 am
And just like the debt in Donegal v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The case was decided in the High Court of England at earlier stages by Arnold J in 2009 (L’Oreal SA & Ors v EBay International AG & Ors [2009] EWHC 1094). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 8:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Indeed, it’s the judiciary who have largely sustained this robust (but mostly fair) approach to human rights law in England and Wales. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:37 am
The circuit court in February 2020 declared Continuing to have satisfied the payment obligations. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
The Safari Workaround was essentially the subject-matter of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 [2016] QB 1003. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
