Search for: "Equipment Service Parts Inc" Results 421 - 440 of 1,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
The company owners also attempted to rely on retraining of employees as part of its response, but the dates didn’t add up. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:09 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
The Hospital ultimately paid $69 million as part of the Settlement, and the two physicians together paid approximately $750k. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 3:45 am by Heidi Henson
The EEOC invoked this principle in EEOC v Papin Enterprises, Inc (MDFla, April 7, 2009), a case involving a franchise employee who sought exemption on religious grounds form a third-party corporation’s dress code that applied to all franchises. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Rob Robinson
 Sonasoft will not only integrate Hotify’s AI technology into its solutions but will also obtain revenue from AI related services and OEM (original equipment manufacturers) relationships. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
These free services were supposedly given to durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers who bought sleep apnea masks from the Pennsylvania company during the period from April 2012 to November 2015. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
These free services were supposedly given to durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers who bought sleep apnea masks from the Pennsylvania company during the period from April 2012 to November 2015. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
These free services were supposedly given to durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers who bought sleep apnea masks from the Pennsylvania company during the period from April 2012 to November 2015. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
Motorola Inc. is now available on JUDIS (date: 20 October 2010). [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
The doctrine has been part of our jurisprudence since it was first adopted by this court in Sunnyslope Grading, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:36 pm by Steven Boutwell
The court distinguished a Fifth Circuit case holding that a contract for wireline services (which were also part of the plug and abandon operations here) was non-maritime by noting that the wireline services contract “did not address in any way the use of a ship. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:26 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
They also found workers were not protected from operating parts of cranes during service and maintenance because locking devices, guards and other safety procedures were not used and equipment was not powered down properly. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 5:39 am
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, issued an opinion that a certificate of medical necessity (“CMN”) does not unequivocally establish that durable medical equipment (“DME”) meets the reimbursement test of “reasonable and necessary”, as required by Medicare Part B. [read post]