Search for: "Exceptional Brands, LLC" Results 421 - 440 of 634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
Since Kernzer’s “casino services” were clearly rendered outside the United States, Kerzner had to rely upon an exception to the territoriality principle to claim that its use of the Atlantis mark outside the United States gave it trademark rights in the United States..With respect to one noted exception to the territoriality principle – described in International Bancorp, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP) Experimental use exception: an Indian perspective (Spicy IP) Ireland Ireland opts to retain relative grounds examinations (Class 46) Israel Israel Court rules copyright and moral right infringement against publisher: Ardov vs. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(IP Tango)   South Africa Brand bullies: IP and the SMEs - difficulties faced by small companies in defending trade mark infringement claims (Afro-IP) Avoiding the ambush: FIFA World Cup (Afro-IP)   Switzerland JAVA MONSTER vulnerable and unprotected in Switzerland (Class 46)   Uganda Uganda’s Copyright Regulations finally published! [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
Stated differently, when “the Jaffe Group had an interest in Tropicana Enterprises, there was a reason for the Jaffe Group to have some ability to prevent Aztar from using the Tropicana name elsewhere (either in competition or in ways that might dilute the value of the brand) if Aztar were no longer operating the Tropicana Las Vegas. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Gordon Firemark
(except they’re not hers…he eventually figures this out by comparing her songs to  some songs from YouTube. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Equilon Enterprise, LLC, defined “suffer or permit” to work in accordance with California Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
Applicant argued that the nature of the involved goods is “irrelevant,” as are all the other duPont factors (except one), because the marks are so different. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  In the process, the FDA starts with the branded drug’s label and asks the brand manufacturer to identify which parts of the labeled uses are infringing. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
”[4] The Supreme Court once reversed him for reading an “unwritten exception” into a law he didn’t like, because “[h]owever sensible” his dislike of it might have been, a “court’s task is to apply the text [of a statute], not to improve upon it. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
VIP Products LLC, a dispute involving a “Bad Spaniels” dog toy parody of Jack Daniel’s brand of whisky. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
  Except maybe federal court. [read post]