Search for: "FDIC-Receiver"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
Background As discussed here, on November 30, 2012, the FDIC as receiver of The Buckhead Community Bank filed a complaint in the Northern District of Georgia against nine former directors and officers of the failed bank. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:29 am
The FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank, moved to intervene in the state court action, and on December 30, 2011, removed the state court action to the District of Puerto Rico. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
Secret Service, FDIC, HUD-OIG, Department of Justice OIG, Howard County Police Department and Howard County State’s Attorney’s Office for their work in the investigation. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
Director Cordray acknowledged at the hearing that the CFPB had received data from leading manufactured housing lenders. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
For example, entry-level Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation (FDIC) employees make $51,630 on average and senior policy analysts start at $145,757, he says, while entry-level investment bankers had a median annual salary of $90,560 and high-level financial managers earned $160,900 in 2012. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:58 pm
The requesting party, FDIC-R (FDIC as Receiver), opposed Plaintiff’s unilateral action for several reasons, including the lack of transparency around the predictive coding methodology employed and that the predictive coding protocol did not comport with the recommended “best practices” for the chosen software program. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:51 am
The FDIC took control of the bank on September 28, 2008 and the bank holding company filed for bankruptcy. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:47 pm
Avery was sentenced to 84 months in prison and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $10,323,369 to the FDIC as Receiver for Washington Mutual, GMAC Mortgage, SunTrust Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank, US Bank, and others. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:59 am
Tkac and other conspirators generally received several thousand dollars in kickbacks from each fraudulent transaction closed by Taggart. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:04 pm
The SEC has received more than 200 comment letters, noted Chairman Garrett, but has not yet taken further action on the rule proposal. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:04 am
The case was investigated by special agents from the IRS-Criminal Investigations, Federal Bureau of Investigation, SIGTARP, Federal Reserve, and the FDIC. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:00 am
The case was investigated by special agents from the IRS-Criminal Investigations, Federal Bureau of Investigation, SIGTARP, Federal Reserve, and the FDIC. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The serious campaign begun a few weeks ago by the FDIC as the receiver of Indymac is one example of this policy being put into effect in earnest. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:47 am
The possible liability of persons acting on behalf of the FDIC was intended to apply to FDIC contractors and, in any event, the former examiner had alleged no connection to that agency. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
” He rejected the FDIC’s argument that the exclusion’s reference to “receiver” referred only to a court-appointed receiver, saying that “while the FDIC attempts to differentiate itself from other types of receivers, it fails to identify any significant distinction that would justify an interpretation of Exclusion 21 that would treat the FDIC differently from any other type of receiver. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 10:01 am
The investigation was handled jointly the FBI, IRS and FDIC-OIG. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
It further indicates that correcting such issues, including making full restitution, will be considered by the FDIC in reviewing a bank’s disclosures and practices. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:57 pm
Until it failed, Sonoma Valley Bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), was a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, and had received $8.65 million in funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
The appellate court noted specifically that, while the insurer argued that the FDIC was proceeding only its capacity as receiver, the FDIC for its part alleged more than that it had succeeded to the rights of the failed bank. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
A reasonable person in the position of the insured would understand that the ‘insured v. insured’ exclusion means that claims by FDIC as receiver are excluded. [read post]
