Search for: "FEDERAL CONTRACTING, INC. v. USA"
Results 421 - 440
of 536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 1:38 pm
In Canon USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Chase Bank USA, N.A., v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:57 am
The issue accepted by the Court is:Whether, in the absence of a private right of action to enforce a statute, federal courts have the federal common law authority to confer a private right of action simply because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is embodied in a contract. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Kentucky)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief of states Title: Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
They are: Astra USA Inc., et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
” See Description of DefCon Defense Condition, Federation of American Scientists, http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/c3i/defcon.htm (last visited August 12, 2010); see also WARGAMES (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer 1983) (Dr. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
In Bodum USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
Maersk Contractors USA, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For the purpose of this section, self-propelled caterpillar or crawler-type equipment while being operated on the contract site, shall not be defined as motor vehicles.In May of this year, Rep. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
These ATTM allies argue that it does not matter what the evidence in a case would show, that it does not matter what the state law at issue says, and that there is simply a federal right for any corporation to put in any contract a term that bans class actions (so long as the contract includes an arbitration clause). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango) Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW) United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
Philip Morris USA, Inc., are expected to be considered at the Justices’ June 24 conference; if cert. is granted, the case would be argued next Term. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:23 am
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc., et al., 2009 N.Y. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm
Northeast, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog and Tony Mauro at the Blog of the Legal Times cover the cert. denial in Textron, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
Aspen Square Management, Inc., 295 F. [read post]
