Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 421 - 440
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Performers and songwriters - the actual creators of recorded music - have been making noises recently in the ongoing debate about reforms to copyright. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm
Applying these considerations to the case of a duty of care, it’s interesting to note the most recent argument in the FTC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Defamation * Lokhova v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
Loan Payment Administration LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 5:30 am
Beckett, 2014 BCSC 731 http://t.co/bYDhl67XHS -> Scope of Sale of Goods Act and limit of liability provisions in franchise agreement in Ma v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 12:40 pm
In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:17 pm
568/20, J v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection A joint study by academics at Princeton University Centre for Information Technology Policy and Radboud University Digital Security Group, which set out to investigate how online services have complied with the GDPR and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), has ended in confusion, frustration and wasted costs for the businesses and organisations unwittingly subjected to the study. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
See Aderhold v. [read post]
