Search for: "Farmer v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm by Mark Walsh
  Or a manufacturer of cars, you can sell cars in the United States, but every third car you have to give to the United States? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Nevertheless, as exemplified by the United States and Canadian Supreme Court cases, Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Nevertheless, as exemplified by the United States and Canadian Supreme Court cases, Diamond v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In brief, the $680,000,000 in damages that were awarded under the settlement agreement was intended to compensate Native American farmers who alleged that the United States Department of Agriculture discriminated against them personally. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
While I hate the Red Sox (but ironically love the Celtics), it is true that the tradition of anonymous speech is older than the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Jason Poblete
How the United States and Cuba find closure to the multi-billion dollar property question will set the tone for such matters in the future. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:14 am
Setting the stage for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the full 9th Circuit has denied a request for rehearing in the NEDC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
As IntLawGrrl Hope Lewis has written, Hurston became an "anthropologist of Black cultures in the southern United States, Haiti, and Jamaica. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm by Brian Wm. Higgins
Rosetta Stone press release (April 10, 2012): "Rosetta Stone greatly appreciates today's opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
ABlawg.caEighty Percent Of Success Is Showing Up: Or “How A Pro Se Farmer Won A Default Against The United States In His Suit To Invalidate The Permit For Half Of Keystone Xl (& Why It Probably Won’t Last)”Case commented on: Bishop v Bostick, 9:13-cv-00082, (E.D. [read post]