Search for: "Federal Express Corporation v. Focus Corporation"
Results 421 - 440
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
This focus on federal civil law crops up throughout PACT, and to be honest I don’t understand why. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
Dow Jr. wrote in an Oct. 9 memo in Timber Hill LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:59 am
EPA and then in Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), enacted in December 2017, made several significant changes to the federal income tax.[1] The bill reduced tax rates for both corporations and individuals, limited major deductions, and created a new set of rules for companies that earn income overseas. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Regulation S-K Two items in Regulation S-K focus on the disclosure of material risks and uncertainties affecting corporate operations: Item 105 and Item 303. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This requirement stems, in part, from Diamond v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
These reactions were expressed early on in actions that could be characterized as falling within a spectrum from the ludicrous[12] to the racist.[13] It was our original idea to bring together scholars, students, lawyers, and others from Europe, Latin America, Asia, Africa, and North America for a roundtable discussion of these early trends and what they augured for the approaches to meeting the challenges of the disease. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm
Its leading case in this area is Landgraf v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
A fine example is the letter recently sent by the Consumer Mortgage Coalition, a trade association of large national mortgage lenders and servicers, to Chairwoman Sheila Bair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Although the book trains its focus principally on students’ constitutional rights, my examination of this particular field also aims to upend broader conceptions of the Supreme Court’s role in American society. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Congress had enacted a statute that prohibited any corporation from assisting immigrants in entering the United States to perform labor. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
Here I wish to focus attention on the probable influence of Wilson’s bank essay on the Virginia Plan, which until now appears to have been overlooked by historians and legal scholars. [read post]
