Search for: "Federal National v. Cook"
Results 421 - 440
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
In A.B. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:46 pm
(Dist. of Conn.)which addresses the rights of federal employees in Connecticut, Vermont, and New Hampshire, and follows on the heels of the Massachusetts Federal District Court ruling last summer in Gill v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
Nonetheless, the plaintiff cited a federal case, United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
It also held that the priority right must have been assigned before the declaration of priority, which may occur after the filing of the subsequent application.That the priority right cannot be assigned retroactively is hardly a surprise (see Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc for the UK law on the issue). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm
National Rehab Partners Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
Cooke, in which the Court limited the power of federal courts to overturn state parole decisions. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
I’m not particularly knowledgeable about the “home rule” provisions of the Ohio constitution, but the state/local issues presented by that seem to mirror the federal/state sovereignty debate on the national level. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Grant and Greg Cook. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
Senior counsel for the Tryons also relied upon the decision of the Federal Court in WABZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 30; (2004) 134 FCR 271 in which the Refugee Review Tribunal erroneously refused to allow a solicitor to represent a person whose rights under the migration laws of this country were under consideration. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:29 am
Bayada Nurses, Inc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Hewlett-Packard – ALJ Rogers grants motions to terminate investigation as to certain respondents in Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Lockwood – Sham reexamination requests and Federal pre-emption: Lockwood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
United States Air Force case in the 9th Circuit, and the Cook v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
On page 19 of the National Provisioner dated January 2002, an ad by Surebeam included the following statement: "A performance standard is valid only if it measures the performance of the establishment itself ... [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
