Search for: "Fee v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 6,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:45 am
A few months ago I wrote about the Fourth Circuit decision in Shammas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
That aspect concerns the plaintiff lawyers’ arrangements to fee-split with assisting lawyers who are based in the United States. [60] The case law regarding Canadian counsel cooperating in class proceedings with lawyers based in the United States is evolving. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:19 am
Anastasia Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Petitioner Mark Janus is a state employee whose unit is represented by a public-sector union (Union), one of the respondents. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
United States, Horne v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Prudhomme v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:28 pm
A second federal judge has criticized the "win at any cost" mentality of some Assistant United States Attorneys. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:11 am
In particular, the Apology Resolution did not strip Hawaii of its sovereign authority to alienate the lands the United States held in absolute fee and granted to the state upon its admission to the Union.The case has been remanded to the Hawaii Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:07 am
Department of Justice makes the trial exhibits for United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, is a dispute over copyrighted textbooks produced overseas but imported to the United States and resold by Kirtsaeng without the publisher's permission. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Various Coins; United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
