Search for: "Felt v. Price" Results 421 - 440 of 719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 10:53 am by Greg Daugherty
Many commentators were surprised by the recent federal court of claims decision to deny summary judgment in Sutardja v United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted "The Price of Privacy, 1973 to the Present." [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm by Kevin Russell
Although “but for” causation is ordinarily required for most legal claims, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Collins J’s decision is available on the “decisions of public interest” page of the courts’ website – see Earthquake Commission v Unknown Defendants [2013] NZHC 708 [pdf](Good on Justice Collins and the court staff for getting this up so promptly, by the way. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:12 am by Karen Dyck
A few comments with respect to access to justice caught my attention in the recent Manitoba Queen’s Bench (Family Division) decision in Price v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
Motorola would be fine with this in Germany, where it recently felt forced to accept a licensing proposal from Apple and where the parties will meet in court, presumably next year, over the determination of a FRAND rate. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
  For nine Californian jurors from the state which launched Apple and who, like the rest of the American populus, have most likely been indoctrinated into coveting American Apple products in preference to those of the South Korean Samsung, perhaps a finding of rampant infringement with a $1.05 billion damages price-tag just "felt right" – but it doesn't mean that it is just or correct. [read post]