Search for: "Fernandez v. Fernandez" Results 421 - 440 of 765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Arizona, 2020) .11/17/2020[Germany] [Petition granted] [Motion to stay return order pending appeal granted]Rodriguez v  Fernandez,  2020 WL 6566036, (U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States (2009) and the immigration case of Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:07 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Lyle Denniston has a new entry in this blog’s “Made Simple” series, explaining the issues involved in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm by CAPTAIN
  State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle just got some uncomforting news. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The first new relist is Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:45 am
Umberto Fernandez, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant's Life Partner Considered Non-Traditional Family Member, Entitled to Succession Rights Barnard College v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:26 am
Fernandez NASSAU COUNTYTorts Theory of Inherent Compulsion to Overcome Doctrine of Assumption of Risk Doctrine Inapplicable Monti v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKLabor LawFact Issues Bar Judgment for Contractor in Worker's Action Alleging Breaches of State's 'Scaffold Law' Fernandez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Jon Sands
Galan, No. 14-30145 (Fernandez with Tashima and Bea) --- The Ninth Circuit vacated a restitution award in a child porn case, holding that the district court erred in failing to limit the amount of the award to the harm proximately caused by the defendant's crimes, as required by the Supreme Court's decision in Paroline v. [read post]