Search for: "First Pro Group, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 1,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
He would later would take a job with the leading gun control group of the day, Handgun Control, Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
First, in case you missed it, in May 2018 Mulvaney created an Office of Innovation within the CFPB. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”Factor four: first, the district court erred in presuming market harm based on PRO’s [nonexistent] commercial purpose. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
I first wrote about the case in its infancy, in 2010 (read here). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
First, the candidate needs a world view that treats opposition to abortion as a sacred truth that transcends all other concerns. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-9187 Issues: [Petitioner is a pro se prisoner. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:19 am by J. Dana Stuster
The groundswell for Ince is a surprising turnaround given that he was not the opposition’s first-choice candidate; that would have been former Erdogan lieutenant Abdullah Gul, who announced early on that he would not be a candidate due to a lack of consensus within the opposition, though he may have been bullied out of running by senior government officials. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Securities and Exchange Commission 17-1077 Issue: Whether a misstatement claim that does not meet the elements set forth in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
Securities and Exchange Commission, 17-1077 Issue: Whether a misstatement claim that does not meet the elements set forth in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Eugene Volokh
My students Jennifer Milazzo, Joshua Ostrer, and Furqaan Siddiqui and I filed an amicus brief in this case—with the invaluable pro bono help of local counsel Jason Walke (many thanks for that!) [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Perhaps Polsinelli is representing Nagi pro bono(free of charge) because the issue is important to Polsinelli (e.g. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, involving the constitutionality of inter partes review. [read post]