Search for: "Fitzgerald v State"
Results 421 - 440
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
It is interesting that at the ECHR the state appeared to represent that defeat as evidence of an anti-abortion majority in the state, particularly when only some 42% of the population turned out to vote. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
Just Film, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
Criminal Procedure Information; transcripts Sean Fitzgerald Rowell, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
In an opinion by Judge Fitzgerald in City of East Lansing v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 10-cv-4071, U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:17 am
Cantor Fitzgerald, a summary order decided on September 22. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:01 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0067, 2010 MT 226, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
The Prisoners in Revolt states: “The prisoner has realized that the two most important sources of relief are primarily prisoners’ revolt and then successful litigation” (Fitzgerald). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:26 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:01 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0589, 2010 MT 206N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:28 am
In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
According to Piekos, Maher and Fitzgerald stated that the business was "going in a new direction"; that they didn't "really need" Piekos; and they proposed to pay themselves $8,500 per month which, based on then-current projections, would result in Piekos receiving $20,000 annual compensation compared to $120,000 each for Maher and Fitzgerald. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 8:26 pm
Citing State Ex Rel Carroll v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
