Search for: "Force v. Department of Revenue"
Results 421 - 440
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Excess Copyright) Canada Unearthed government memo confirms need for parody right legislation (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Claude Majeau new Vice Chair and CEO at Copyright Board (Excess Copyright) Wal-mart claims trade mark infringement by union website (Canadian Trademark Blog) (Michael Geist) Chile IP Court of Appeal finds SOMOS LOS QUE TIENEN VTR (English: We are the ones who have VTR) not a slogan but a design (IP tango) Annulment appeal invoked again in Chile (IP… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The revenue records of the State revealed that the disputed property stood in the name of the defendants. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
Montana Department of Revenue, holding that if states opt to subsidize private education, they cannot exclude private schools from receiving those funds simply because they are religious. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:05 am
Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:22 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 9:07 am
” Midstates Acceptance v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) PRS CEO departs (1709 Copyright Blog) UK IPO: New trade mark services from 1 October 2009 (Class 46) Are non-binding opinions a useful tool in patent litigation? [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. indirect taxation distinction? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Noncompliance carries steep fines and penalties—up to 4 percent of global revenues. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
In fact, many will be unable to sustain their business models, either due to this liability or simply due to potential decreases in advertising revenue. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Montana Department of Revenue last Term. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:21 am
The Justice Department argued in response that there was no real conflict. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
“Nationally, people are already suggesting boycotting Montana and Idaho’s important tourism industry, which is a top revenue producer for both states. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Feinberg v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm
The revenue should be far greater than originally predicted. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
It deserves, as Lawrence Herman, the former head of the Economic and Treaty Law Section of Canada’s External Affairs Department, pointed out, “careful, reasoned and balanced assessment”. [read post]
