Search for: "Fox v. FCC"
Results 421 - 440
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 11:04 am
But the one that will gain the most attention is FCC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 10:09 am
This morning the Supreme Court announced it will hear an appeal of a lower court ruling in FCC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
Civil cases include: FCC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:06 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday agreed to hear eight cases [Order List, PDF], including FCC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
Fox Television Stations, et al., 07-582). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
The Justices considered the case of FCC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 9:16 am
Then, later in the week, the FCC issued an Order which fined a number of Fox affiliates $7000 each for perceived indecency violations in an episode of the Married By America reality television program, also broadcast in 2003 - following up on a Notice of Apparent Liability issued over two years ago by the FCC. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:03 pm
The appeal, by the Federal Communications Commission and the United States, is now docketed as FCC, et al., v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 5:48 pm
[4] Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:42 pm
That case, FCC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Specifically, the Circuit Court's ruling in Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 pm
Circuit claiming that the "open platforms for devices and applications" portions of the auction rules (the "no locking, no blocking" rules): exceed the Commission's authority under the Communications Actviolate the United States Constitutionviolate the Administrative Procedure Actand are arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence and otherwise contrary to law.Just as a guess, I'd say that VZ Wireless intends to claim that, as in Fox v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
In Fox v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:12 am
FCC U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
" Fox v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 5:49 pm
But it signals that some key federal judges, at least, don't think much of the First Amendment thinking at the FCC. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 4:00 pm
" You can search for the decision (06-1760 Fox v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:26 pm
Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
