Search for: "GAINES v. USA" Results 421 - 440 of 499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
 Greg Stohr at Bloomberg and Joan Biskupic at USA Today also have news reports on the opinion. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:29 am by Erin Miller
Title: Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Lyle Denniston
The funeral picketing case (Snyder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
(Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
Humanitarian Law Project et al. (08-1498), and Humanitarian Law Project et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
Nothing in this judgment should be seen as devaluing the confidentiality principle, and the understanding on which intelligence information is shared between this country and the USA. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
The Justice Department is not challenging the underlying merger, which the companies closed in May 2007.Further details regarding U.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The applicant, Dana Corporation, was incorporated in the USA. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. used a Special Master to determine fees since the attorneys were in disagreement. [read post]