Search for: "Gay v. Gay" Results 421 - 440 of 5,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 8:33 am by NCC Staff
Renowned legal scholar Kenji Yoshino tells the definitive story of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 5:16 pm by David Nickol
Board of Education (1954) of gay rights, the gay-rights equivalent of Loving v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by DOLAN MEDIA NEWSWIRES
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender groups are praising the recent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission decision in Macy v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
  Due to the peculiar way that the adoption statute defines "homosexual" in terms of conduct rather than status, there is a clear conflict with the US Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:24 pm by Dan Harris
With the recent US Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:59 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming As noted here yesterday Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:11 pm by David Mowry
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: "Judge Judy" / Judith Sheindlin, Clerks, Clerkships, Gay, Gay Marriage, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 1:21 am
The decision by a NSW Tribunal in OV and another v QV and another, which I commented on yesterday, may well alter the landscape for schools seeking to defend excluding gay and lesbian students from school formals, or even from the school. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
You can find the documents in NOM v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:55 pm
Last Monday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Good News Employee Association v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:23 am
   There is a significant body of case law dealing with same-sex harassment claims by gay and transgender employees, or non-gay employees who are perceived by other employees as gay, but this case law does not merit any mention in your text, either after your treatment of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]