Search for: "German v. German"
Results 421 - 440
of 5,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 11:17 am
via ncase.me V. cool. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:12 pm
That series, so far held in German, has proven very successful, with sometimes more than 1oo participants. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm
A. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 7:14 am
Just this week, the Supreme Court decided an important conflict of laws question in Cassirer v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:17 am
The dispute had led to a referal to the CJEU, which was decided on 16 July 2015 (Case C-580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Due to the fact that the requirements of this provision were not met, German courts were – according to the Higher Regional Court Karlsruhe – not competent to rule on the adjustment of the (German) pension rights. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Alpenblume and German Graphics ./. van der Schee). [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Article 26 (3) German Trade Mark Act relates to “genuine use†of a trade mark. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
The German courts dismissed their claim. [read post]
Apple faces $2 billion damages claim in Mannheim over wireless patents -- trial on Tuesday (Feb. 11)
5 Feb 2014, 3:00 am
On Tuesday (February 11, 2014), Apple will have to defend itself in a German patent trial against a damages claim amounting to 1.57 billion euros ($2.12 billion), plus prejudgment interest, brought by German patent monetizer IPCom over a wireless standard-essential patent (SEP) upheld (in a narrowed but allegedly still standard-essential form) by the European Patent Office (EPO) last month. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
The German broadcaster namely explained that it was a common practice on the German market and that numerous German hotels (including, as we remember, the defendant in Citadines case) concluded such agreements. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
This comes from Best Buy Co Inc v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana [2010] Bus LR 1761 at para 15; on appeal at [2011] FSR 742 at para 24.Was the German letter a groundless threat? [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:09 am
Today, Attorney General Campos Sánchez-Bordona has delivered his Opinion in the Patrick Breyer v Federal Republic of Germany case before the ECJ (C-582/14; you can find the Opinion here in just about any language except English)). [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:54 pm
In the case on appeal, GSB Gold Standard v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:55 am
Contents include: Erika de Wet, Holger Hestermeyer & Rüdiger Wolfrum, IntroductionRüdiger Wolfrum, Holger Hestermeyer & Silja Vöneky, The reception of international law in the German legal order: An introduction Erika de Wet, The reception of international law in the South African legal order: An introduction Mehrdad Payandeh, The United Nations Charter and the German legal orderDire Tladi, The United Nations Charter and the South African legal… [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 10:58 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
The damages claim of around $7.8 million, or £6.4 million, backfired on the German sportswear giant when it was denied by an eight-person Manhattan jury. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
The damages claim of around $7.8 million, or £6.4 million, backfired on the German sportswear giant when it was denied by an eight-person Manhattan jury. [read post]
